Most
important Action: Get Your Mammogram
Most
important question: WHO is reading the Mammogram?
Breast
cancer is a curable disease with greater than 95% survival if
diagnosed in its earliest forms. Therefore, it is critical to
diagnose breast cancer as early as possible in order for women
to achieve the goal of a cure. Mammography , physical examination
by a health care provider, and breast self examination, remain
the mainstay of breast cancer screening. All three components
are important.
Mammography
is an x-ray examination that evaluates the breast. It uses the
smallest amount of radiation, less than that obtained when flying
transcontinentally. It is a well-accepted and effective method
of diagnosing early stage breast cancer. Numerous studies have
shown the UNEQUIVOCAL and large effect of improved survival in
women who get mammograms, especially if they obtain routine examinations
every year. It is the change in mammography that allows the radiologist
to diagnose the earliest of breast cancer.
There
are 2 different methods of obtaining a mammogram: Analog and Digital.
Analog mammography has been widely available since the 1970's
and is a tried and true method of effectively imaging the breast.
It is obtained using film, which is developed and then interpreted
by a radiologist. Digital mammography is acquired on a "detector."
The data is then displayed on a computer screen. The difference
is much like the difference between a picture taken with a film
or analog camera and the now widely used digital cameras. With
digitally acquired images, whether they be your family photos
or your mammogram, there is the ability to "adjust"
the image. Just as you can change the contrast or remove red-eye
on your photos, so too, the radiologist can adjust the mammogram
which is acquired digitally to improve the image.
Digital
mammography has been available for over 5 years. There has been
an enormous amount of interest in digital mammography by both
patients and medical professionals. After its initial introduction,
there were a number of studies which evaluated that critical question
that everyone was asking, "Was digital mammography better
at diagnosing breast cancer than analog mammography?" All
initial studies comparing digital to analog mammography showed
NO difference in cancer diagnosis. These studies did demonstrate
that most cancers were seen by both technologies, but that there
were some cancers that were seen only with analog and some only
seen with digital. Overall, there was no difference in the ability
to detect breast cancer with either technology. However, all prior
studies were relatively small and only from one institution.
It
became clear that a larger study, involving a number of institutions
was necessary in order to definitely answer the important question
of whether digital mammography was better. Therefore, the definite
study was undertaken involving nearly 49,000 women from a number
of institutions. The study looked at digital and analog mammograms
taken of the same women at the same time. The study, which was
recently published and covered in the media, showed that overall,
there was no difference in the ability of analog or digital mammography
to detect breast cancer. That is, the percentage of cancers diagnosed
with both technologies was statistically the same. However, in
a number of subsets of patients, digital mammography did fare
better in diagnosing breast cancer. These groups include pre-menopausal
women, women with dense breasts and women under 55. In these groups
there was a small, but statistically significant advantage for
digital mammography. Interestingly, 65% of the women in the study
were in one of these 3 groups in which digital mammography was
better.
It
may seem dichotomous that overall there is no statistically significant
difference between digital and analog mammography in a study where
65% of the women included had an advantage with digital mammography.
This has to do with the percentage of women of various age groups
which were included as well as the statistics used in this study.
However, the message is that in many women it does not make a
difference if you obtain your mammograms with an analog unit or
a digital unit. What does matter is that YOU GET YOUR MAMMOGRAM!!
However, if you are under 55, pre-menopausal or have dense breasts,
you might want to consider having your mammogram with a digital
unit.
It
is important to understand that there are other considerations,
besides the type of mammography machine that will impact the ability
to detect breast cancer on your mammogram. It has been shown repeatedly
and without question that WHO interprets your mammogram is critical!!!
It is best to have your mammogram interpreted by a radiologist
that concentrates on mammography (that is spends a majority of
their time interpreting breast imaging studies) or even more,
a radiologist who is a dedicated breast imager and devotes all
their professional time to diagnosing breast cancer. If you are
going to ask what type of machine your mammogram is being taken
on, you should also inquire who is going to interpret your exam
and what percentage of their time is spent in breast imaging.
Although there have not been studies investigating which is more
important, the type of machine or who is interpreting your examination,
I believe the physician interpreting your study is more important.
You might also want to find out if your mammogram is being assessed
with computer aided detection (CAD) which uses artificial intelligence
to improve breast cancer diagnosis by about 23%.
In
summary, there are many factors which impact the ability to detect
breast cancer on a mammogram. The recently reported study demonstrates
that in some women, having their mammogram with a digital mammography
unit will improve the diagnosis of cancer as will the qualifications
and ability of the radiologist interpreting the examination and
whether computer aided detection is used. However, it is important
to remember that the most important factor is getting your mammogram.
It is clear that if you don't get your mammogram, you will undoubtedly
lose the potential opportunity to diagnose an early and curable
breast cancer.